<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Walter Reed: The Obvious Lesson</title>
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/03/02/walter-reed-the-obvious-lesson/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: C M Hughes, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/03/02/walter-reed-the-obvious-lesson/#comment-8060</link>
		<dc:creator>C M Hughes, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/03/02/walter-reed-the-obvious-lesson/#comment-8060</guid>
		<description>OK, Walter reed is actually a DOD facility and not part of the VA system. So is the Bethesda Naval Hospital, I am chagrined to admit. I thought Bethesda had both.

And outsourcing, not socialized medicine, was the problem:
http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0307/030507m1.htm

Cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Walter reed is actually a DOD facility and not part of the VA system. So is the Bethesda Naval Hospital, I am chagrined to admit. I thought Bethesda had both.</p>
<p>And outsourcing, not socialized medicine, was the problem:<br />
<a href="http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0307/030507m1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0307/030507m1.htm</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catron</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/03/02/walter-reed-the-obvious-lesson/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/03/02/walter-reed-the-obvious-lesson/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>The emptiness of your position is demonstrated by your deployment of ad hominem cheap shots in lieu of any intelligent response to my basic point. In reality, “single-payer” and “universal” health care are nothing more than euphemisms for “socialized medicine.” From the perspective of the patients who would receive “care” in such a system, these distinctions would be utterly meaningless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The emptiness of your position is demonstrated by your deployment of ad hominem cheap shots in lieu of any intelligent response to my basic point. In reality, “single-payer” and “universal” health care are nothing more than euphemisms for “socialized medicine.” From the perspective of the patients who would receive “care” in such a system, these distinctions would be utterly meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: over my med body! &#187; Health Care BS Spouts BS</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/03/02/walter-reed-the-obvious-lesson/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>over my med body! &#187; Health Care BS Spouts BS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 02:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/03/02/walter-reed-the-obvious-lesson/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s really kind of sad/scary/amusing that a guy that runs a blog called &#8220;Health Care BS&#8221; and claims to have spent 20 years in health care finance doesn&#8217;t know the difference between a single-payer system and a national health service. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It&#8217;s really kind of sad/scary/amusing that a guy that runs a blog called &#8220;Health Care BS&#8221; and claims to have spent 20 years in health care finance doesn&#8217;t know the difference between a single-payer system and a national health service. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
