<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Universal Health Care: When the Bills Come Due</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/05/14/universal-health-care-when-the-bills-come-due/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/05/14/universal-health-care-when-the-bills-come-due/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 21:39:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catron</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/05/14/universal-health-care-when-the-bills-come-due/#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 18:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/05/14/universal-health-care-when-the-bills-come-due/#comment-1191</guid>
		<description>It would be immeasurably worse if attempted at the federal level. This type of &quot;reform&quot; has been incredibly expensive wherever it has been tried. Extended over 300 million people, it would be a disaster.

I agree that the system needs reform, but I would go in the opposite direction (i.e. deregulation, reallignment of tax incentives, free-market innovation, etc.). More government isn&#039;t the answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be immeasurably worse if attempted at the federal level. This type of &#8220;reform&#8221; has been incredibly expensive wherever it has been tried. Extended over 300 million people, it would be a disaster.</p>
<p>I agree that the system needs reform, but I would go in the opposite direction (i.e. deregulation, reallignment of tax incentives, free-market innovation, etc.). More government isn&#8217;t the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seiffer</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/05/14/universal-health-care-when-the-bills-come-due/#comment-1190</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seiffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 17:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/05/14/universal-health-care-when-the-bills-come-due/#comment-1190</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised that a single state trying to pay for universal health care would find itself at a disadvantage. That doesn&#039;t mean if you distribute the cost more fairly - across the entire nation - that it won&#039;t be a worth while investment. 

As a nation, we pay more per capita for health care and have worse health statistics than most of the developed world. Something is certainly wrong with our current system we&#039;re not getting our money&#039;s worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised that a single state trying to pay for universal health care would find itself at a disadvantage. That doesn&#8217;t mean if you distribute the cost more fairly &#8211; across the entire nation &#8211; that it won&#8217;t be a worth while investment. </p>
<p>As a nation, we pay more per capita for health care and have worse health statistics than most of the developed world. Something is certainly wrong with our current system we&#8217;re not getting our money&#8217;s worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

