<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Socialized Medicine: Inefficient and Immoral</title>
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eli Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-15382</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 04:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-15382</guid>
		<description>The framing of the health care debate is completely skewed.  Life and survival are not data points in an economic analysis.  Receiving adequate health care treatment is not about economic efficiency any more than receiving adequate police protection (or military protection) is a matter of economics.  You can argue dollars and cents and use the dimensions of "greed" and "self-interest" to assign values to life and health, but these are merely attempts to normalize fundamentally non-quantifiable factors.

Access to adequate medical care is a moral issue.  If we can provide it, we should do it, even when (and maybe because) it hurts.  When my children are sick, I care for them.  When my parents are sick, I care for them.  Not because it is in my economic self-interest to do so (although eco-pundits will find ways to quantify this on a macrosocial level, I'm sure).  I do it because it is the moral thing to do.  Money is not the irreducible currency of life.  Much fuzzier things like "quality," "satisfaction," "fulfillment," and "membership" are.  Our satisfaction as human beings derives mostly from our emotions, and these are tickled only tangentially by matters of the wallet, but far more by the gratification of belonging to a well-functioning society.

I wish we would all stop pretending that the money really matters.  It is making us stray from the very things that make us human, happy, and wise.  Our society has become sick with willful self-deception.  It's time to alter course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The framing of the health care debate is completely skewed.  Life and survival are not data points in an economic analysis.  Receiving adequate health care treatment is not about economic efficiency any more than receiving adequate police protection (or military protection) is a matter of economics.  You can argue dollars and cents and use the dimensions of &#8220;greed&#8221; and &#8220;self-interest&#8221; to assign values to life and health, but these are merely attempts to normalize fundamentally non-quantifiable factors.</p>
<p>Access to adequate medical care is a moral issue.  If we can provide it, we should do it, even when (and maybe because) it hurts.  When my children are sick, I care for them.  When my parents are sick, I care for them.  Not because it is in my economic self-interest to do so (although eco-pundits will find ways to quantify this on a macrosocial level, I&#8217;m sure).  I do it because it is the moral thing to do.  Money is not the irreducible currency of life.  Much fuzzier things like &#8220;quality,&#8221; &#8220;satisfaction,&#8221; &#8220;fulfillment,&#8221; and &#8220;membership&#8221; are.  Our satisfaction as human beings derives mostly from our emotions, and these are tickled only tangentially by matters of the wallet, but far more by the gratification of belonging to a well-functioning society.</p>
<p>I wish we would all stop pretending that the money really matters.  It is making us stray from the very things that make us human, happy, and wise.  Our society has become sick with willful self-deception.  It&#8217;s time to alter course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catron</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5821</link>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5821</guid>
		<description>My views on such things are similar to those of Milton Friedman and other so-called &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minarchist" rel="nofollow"&gt;Minarchists&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My views on such things are similar to those of Milton Friedman and other so-called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minarchist" rel="nofollow">Minarchists</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5785</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5785</guid>
		<description>Out of interest, do you think there is such a thing as human society?

Do you also advocate the existence of nation states?

And if so, what morally - or even efficiently should that state extract from its citizens in tax dollars, and for what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of interest, do you think there is such a thing as human society?</p>
<p>Do you also advocate the existence of nation states?</p>
<p>And if so, what morally - or even efficiently should that state extract from its citizens in tax dollars, and for what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5784</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5784</guid>
		<description>Again, you're not.  You may well be utilizing that very dollar the next day.  That's the difference between it and robbery.  When I rob you, you're not going to be utilizing what I take anytime soon, or ever.

The immorality argument is the weakest of all arguments against single payer.  You can do better, and have.  But you're getting to the bottom of the barrell.

Perhaps it's time for you to start proposing concrete alternatives rather than simply playing the critic 24/7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, you&#8217;re not.  You may well be utilizing that very dollar the next day.  That&#8217;s the difference between it and robbery.  When I rob you, you&#8217;re not going to be utilizing what I take anytime soon, or ever.</p>
<p>The immorality argument is the weakest of all arguments against single payer.  You can do better, and have.  But you&#8217;re getting to the bottom of the barrell.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s time for you to start proposing concrete alternatives rather than simply playing the critic 24/7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catron</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5783</link>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5783</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;You’re not really taking it from that person and giving it to another.&lt;/em&gt;

Of course you are. You're forcing people into a risk pool that they may not want to participate in. Laws requiring people to buy insurance are the direct result of the very insurance lobby that "progressives" are always complaining about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>You’re not really taking it from that person and giving it to another.</em></p>
<p>Of course you are. You&#8217;re forcing people into a risk pool that they may not want to participate in. Laws requiring people to buy insurance are the direct result of the very insurance lobby that &#8220;progressives&#8221; are always complaining about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5782</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5782</guid>
		<description>Except you're not really taking it from that person and giving it to another.  You are requiring them to purchase a service, a service they will utilize themselves.  They may well use that money the day after they send their premium in.

Do you argue all taxes are "immoral" even though they may go for a road you utilize?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except you&#8217;re not really taking it from that person and giving it to another.  You are requiring them to purchase a service, a service they will utilize themselves.  They may well use that money the day after they send their premium in.</p>
<p>Do you argue all taxes are &#8220;immoral&#8221; even though they may go for a road you utilize?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catron</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5780</link>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5780</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Could explain how it is “immoral?” &lt;/em&gt;

To forcibly take money from one person and give it to another (whose need for it is no greater) is robbery. You can dress it up with euphemisms all day long, but it is larceny nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Could explain how it is “immoral?” </em></p>
<p>To forcibly take money from one person and give it to another (whose need for it is no greater) is robbery. You can dress it up with euphemisms all day long, but it is larceny nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catron</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5779</link>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5779</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Those who argue for it [universal healthcare] are indeed morally superior.&lt;/em&gt;

Thank you for confirming my theory on "progressive" motivation (and delusions of grandeur).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Those who argue for it [universal healthcare] are indeed morally superior.</em></p>
<p>Thank you for confirming my theory on &#8220;progressive&#8221; motivation (and delusions of grandeur).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamelle</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5777</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5777</guid>
		<description>Could explain how it is "immoral?"  I have a feeling that you're trying to make the claim that moral obligation extends only as far as one's own direct action.  But I don't buy that at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could explain how it is &#8220;immoral?&#8221;  I have a feeling that you&#8217;re trying to make the claim that moral obligation extends only as far as one&#8217;s own direct action.  But I don&#8217;t buy that at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5776</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/08/23/socialized-medicine-inefficient-and-immoral/#comment-5776</guid>
		<description>

Better off people in the UK pay a lot more tax and national insurance contributions. And the vast bulk of the population are low and middle earners, who make most use of the NHS. The truly wealthy often use private medicine - and so they pay twice. 

Just to pick you up on 'hoi polloi' - it means the masses, who of course have most to gain from universal healthcare. Quite rightly, those who argue for it are indeed morally superior to the health insurers and hangers on who are desperate to carry on picking as many pockets as they can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better off people in the UK pay a lot more tax and national insurance contributions. And the vast bulk of the population are low and middle earners, who make most use of the NHS. The truly wealthy often use private medicine - and so they pay twice. </p>
<p>Just to pick you up on &#8216;hoi polloi&#8217; - it means the masses, who of course have most to gain from universal healthcare. Quite rightly, those who argue for it are indeed morally superior to the health insurers and hangers on who are desperate to carry on picking as many pockets as they can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
