<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robbing the Poor to Pay for SCHIP</title>
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/10/01/robbing-the-poor-to-pay-for-schip/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Catron</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/10/01/robbing-the-poor-to-pay-for-schip/#comment-7611</link>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/10/01/robbing-the-poor-to-pay-for-schip/#comment-7611</guid>
		<description>It's "heavily disputed" only by the frauds who make the preposterous claim that SCHIP can be paid for with a cig tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;heavily disputed&#8221; only by the frauds who make the preposterous claim that SCHIP can be paid for with a cig tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/10/01/robbing-the-poor-to-pay-for-schip/#comment-7608</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/10/01/robbing-the-poor-to-pay-for-schip/#comment-7608</guid>
		<description>'And, as I point out here, a recent study shows that low-income people continue to buy tobacco products in the same quantities even when taxes cause the price to go up.'

As you well know this study is heavily disputed. For a start, it looks at number of smokers not number of cigarettes smoked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;And, as I point out here, a recent study shows that low-income people continue to buy tobacco products in the same quantities even when taxes cause the price to go up.&#8217;</p>
<p>As you well know this study is heavily disputed. For a start, it looks at number of smokers not number of cigarettes smoked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
