Medicare for All = Freedom for None

The Cato Institute has published an excellent policy analysis that includes a scathing indictment of various attempts by government bureaucrats to restrict the personal autonomy and privacy of Medicare patients:

Over the past 20 years, the Medicare bureaucracy … has limited the freedom of Medicare beneficiaries to purchase medical services with their own money.

For example, if a patient wishes to receive more services from a physician than are paid for by Medicare, CMS doesn’t allow it—even if the patient is willing and able to pay for these services:

HCFA [now CMS] effectively prohibited private contracts between Medicare beneficiaries and their physicians … Not even beneficiary-initiated transactions with which the beneficiary was perfectly satisfied were exempt.

Ironically, this sort of thing is so contrary to common sense and the principles of individual liberty that even Canada has put a stop to it.

In a landmark case handed down in 2005, the Supreme Court of Canada … recognized that imposing limits on a patient’s freedom to spend his own money can result in his being denied crucial and even life-saving medical services.

Nonetheless, ignoring a couple of major legal decisions, our Medicare bureaucracy continues to limit such freedom for American patients:

Those limitations violate beneficiaries’ right to privacy, undermine a tool that could reduce the burden Medicare imposes on taxpayers, and may deny care to Medicare beneficiaries outright.

If you think this sort of nonsense wouldn’t metastasize under “Medicare for All,” I’ve got a bridge in Brooklyn I’d like to sell you.

viagra
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen

Comments 5

  1. drmatt wrote:

    Actually this is not true, what you are missing here is a basic insurance fraud law, medicare patients can get as much care as they want from whomever they wish, but they may have to pay out of pocket. The bottom line is if you are a medicare provider you must first bill medicare and then be denied before you can pass the bill on to the patient. I have read much of your blog, you are obviously quite opposed to single payer systems and/or socialized medicine. I think you have to answer this question in scenario before you can criticize (with any legitamacy) any socialized or single payor system. Health care, right or privelege? There is no inbetween. If you show up in my office with your sick daughter and I determine that you don’t have the means to pay so I send you home and your daughter dies is that ok? Then you are truly for privelege, if you dont agree with this it must then be a right, otherwise you are trying to straddle the line which will require a lot of regulation. If I must operate as a business I must be able to insure that I get paid, you wont get your car fixed if you can’t pay. Otherwise it is a right, in which case we need to remove profit driven capitalistic sources from the formula.

    Posted 26 Oct 2007 at 6:14 am
  2. Rich wrote:

    drmatt - you are incorrect.

    If I provide a service which medicare will not pay for, and I have warned the patient, in advance and in writing, that medicare may not pay, then I can bill the patient. If I have not warned the patient in writing, in advance, I may not bill the patient.

    If, on the other hand, I provide a service which medicare DOES pay for, and I charge more than medicare allows, I MAY NOT bill the patient for the balance. Medicare must deny the WHOLE CHARGE for the service before I can charge the patient, providing I have a signed ABN from the patient before providing the service.

    So medicare recipients can get all the healthcare they want to pay out of pocket for, as long as it does not include services for which medicare pays anything.

    “The bottom line is if you are a medicare provider you must first bill medicare and then be denied before you can pass the bill on to the patient.”

    Wrong. I can only “pass the bill on to the patient” if I have a signed ABN, and medicare pays Nothing, nada, zilch. If I charge more for a service than medicare allows, and they pay, I cannot bill the patient the balance, regardless of my costs. So I may choose not to provide services for which my costs exceed what medicare allows. You have no right to force me to do so. You certainly have a right to find someone willing to provide the service, though.

    Posted 26 Oct 2007 at 8:12 am
  3. drmatt wrote:

    I stand corrected, I do remember getting those pesky ABNs signed. There is also the point, that if I am not a medicare provider, I may bill the patient whatever I wish. Being a medicaide provider is similar to being a provider for any of the other insurance companies in that you are bound by a “contract”. So this really is about contractual law.

    The most important point being, however, is that the assertion that the governement is making laws to limit how patient’s spend thier money really is not true. The laws are about contracts, and contracted providers, no patient’s, the patients are free to see non medicare providers and pay thier life savings out for plastic surgery if they wish.

    Posted 26 Oct 2007 at 8:35 am
  4. Rich wrote:

    Again - this needs a little clarification.

    For medicare, Non-particpating providers must still follow the same rules as above. In order to be a “non-medicare provider”, in your terms, means opting out. If you do not contract with medicare (non-par) you are subject to the same rules. Failing to follow them is not a contract violation (tort), it is fraud, punishable in a criminal proceeding.

    Currently, in order to opt out, you must sign an agreement with the local medicare contractor, that you will not accept payment from medicare, for any patients, for 2 years. Then, to propoerly bill patients, yo must contarct with the patient, in writing, your fees for all servcies, in advance.

    If the patient does not contract, you cannot charge them. If you widh to opt-in - you must wait until the 2 years have expired.

    Since the discussion is about health care, and not cosmetics, the plastic surgery comment is not relevant. If I opt out, and you ( a mediare recipient) would like me to attend to you in the hospital, or in my office, You must agree to my fee schecule, in advance and in writing, before I can charge you anything.

    Posted 26 Oct 2007 at 9:48 am
  5. drmatt wrote:

    Duly educated.

    Posted 26 Oct 2007 at 10:33 am

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *