<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OBAMA &#038; THE WRIGHT WING CONSPIRACY</title>
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/03/16/obama-the-wright-wing-conspiracy/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/03/16/obama-the-wright-wing-conspiracy/#comment-63803</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/03/16/obama-the-wright-wing-conspiracy/#comment-63803</guid>
		<description>Fox news wants to talk about that they are fair and balanced, but in reality they are not. To talk about the rest of the media is avoiding talking about the pastor of Obama and try everything they can to make Obama (A Half Black/ Half white person) to be a black suppressor. But if they want to talk about the media avoiding, why are they avoiding to talk about the case that Hillary Clinton has in November with Peter Paul? The news was all over it when they didn't have evidence on the Peter Paul case, but as soon he came out with recorded tapes and so much evidence that could put Hillary Clinton in jail for 5 years, the media chicken out. Not everybody in Fox News is unfair, even Bill O' Reilly said the media itself was corrupted. 

Hillary and Bill Clinton have made a significant issue about how the press is treating Hillary unfairly in their hyper-critical reporting on her and their “softball” reporting on Barak Obama. Hillary maintains she has been fully investigated by the media and Barak hasn’t!

As the Tony Rezko trial begins in Chicago, Clinton and her surrogates are linking Obama to Rezko and the media is speculating about whether Obama will be called to testify as a witness in the case. Obama has always admitted he received $85,000 in contributions from Rezko which Obama has now donated to charity rather than keep.

Yet the civil fraud trial of Bill Clinton for defrauduing Hillary’s largest donor in 2000 into giving her campaign more than $1.2 million,  pending in Los Angeles courts  since 2003, is now preparing for a November, 2008 trial. The discovery that is now proceeding after a February 21 hearing, and the pending trial, have NEVER been announced by the mainstream media.

Hillary was able to extricate herself as a co-defendant in the case in January, 2008 after years of appeals  to be protected by  the First Amendment  from tort claims arising out of federal campaign solicitations she made. Her abuse of the intent of California’s anti-SLAPP law after the California Supreme Court refused to dismiss her from the case in 2004 is emblematic of her contempt for the Rule of Law.

Hillary will be called as a witness in both discovery and the trial according to the trial court Judge who so-advised Hillary’s attorney David Kendall when he dismissed Hillary as a co-defendant in 2007. A subpoena is being prepared this month and will be served personally on Hillary, along with Chelsea, Pa Gov. Ed Rendell, Al Gore and other well known political and media figures.

Yet the media has refused to report about this landmark civil fraud case- brought by Hillary’s biggest 2000 donor to her Senate race, regarding allegations that were corroborated by the Department of Justice in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May, 2005. That indictment and trial was credited as resulting from the civil suit’s allegations by Peter Paul, the Hollywood dot com millionaire Bill Clinton convinced to donate more than $1.2 million (according to the DOJ prosecutors and the FBI) to Hillary’s Senate campaign as part of a post White House business deal with Bill.

The media - except for World Net Daily- has also suspiciously refused to report on Hillary’s last FEC report regarding her 2000 Senate campaign, filed in January 30, 2006. In a secret settlement of an FEC complaint by the plaintiff in Paul v Clinton, Peter Paul, the FEC fined Hillary’s campaign $35,000 for hiding more than $720,000 in donations from Paul, and it required Hillary’s campaign to file a 4th amended FEC report.

In that report Hillary and her campaign again hid Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to her campaign and falsely attributed $250,000 as being donated by Paul’s partner, Spider Man creator Stan Lee, who swore in a video taped deposition he never gave Hillary or her campaign any money.

Lee did testify to trading $100,000 checks with Paul to make it appear he gave $100,000 to Hillary’s campaign (admission of a felony) but none of that has been reported by the “overly critical” media!

Where is the outrage from Obama that the press is engaging in a double standard relating to his possible role in the Rezko trial and his refunding the $85,000 contributed to his campaign by Rezko- which Obama has always admitted taking. The media makes no mention of Hillary’s role as a witness in Bill’s fraud trial for defrauding Hillary’s largest donor- and Hillary’s refusal to refund the $1.2 million she illegally received from Paul, which she has denied taking from Paul ever since the Washington Post asked her about Paul and his felony convictions from the 1970’s before her first Senate election in 2000?

Check out www.Hillcap.org for proof of Hillary Clinton commiting crimes. The evidence that could have put Hillary Clinton in jail for 5 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox news wants to talk about that they are fair and balanced, but in reality they are not. To talk about the rest of the media is avoiding talking about the pastor of Obama and try everything they can to make Obama (A Half Black/ Half white person) to be a black suppressor. But if they want to talk about the media avoiding, why are they avoiding to talk about the case that Hillary Clinton has in November with Peter Paul? The news was all over it when they didn&#8217;t have evidence on the Peter Paul case, but as soon he came out with recorded tapes and so much evidence that could put Hillary Clinton in jail for 5 years, the media chicken out. Not everybody in Fox News is unfair, even Bill O&#8217; Reilly said the media itself was corrupted. </p>
<p>Hillary and Bill Clinton have made a significant issue about how the press is treating Hillary unfairly in their hyper-critical reporting on her and their “softball” reporting on Barak Obama. Hillary maintains she has been fully investigated by the media and Barak hasn’t!</p>
<p>As the Tony Rezko trial begins in Chicago, Clinton and her surrogates are linking Obama to Rezko and the media is speculating about whether Obama will be called to testify as a witness in the case. Obama has always admitted he received $85,000 in contributions from Rezko which Obama has now donated to charity rather than keep.</p>
<p>Yet the civil fraud trial of Bill Clinton for defrauduing Hillary’s largest donor in 2000 into giving her campaign more than $1.2 million,  pending in Los Angeles courts  since 2003, is now preparing for a November, 2008 trial. The discovery that is now proceeding after a February 21 hearing, and the pending trial, have NEVER been announced by the mainstream media.</p>
<p>Hillary was able to extricate herself as a co-defendant in the case in January, 2008 after years of appeals  to be protected by  the First Amendment  from tort claims arising out of federal campaign solicitations she made. Her abuse of the intent of California’s anti-SLAPP law after the California Supreme Court refused to dismiss her from the case in 2004 is emblematic of her contempt for the Rule of Law.</p>
<p>Hillary will be called as a witness in both discovery and the trial according to the trial court Judge who so-advised Hillary’s attorney David Kendall when he dismissed Hillary as a co-defendant in 2007. A subpoena is being prepared this month and will be served personally on Hillary, along with Chelsea, Pa Gov. Ed Rendell, Al Gore and other well known political and media figures.</p>
<p>Yet the media has refused to report about this landmark civil fraud case- brought by Hillary’s biggest 2000 donor to her Senate race, regarding allegations that were corroborated by the Department of Justice in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May, 2005. That indictment and trial was credited as resulting from the civil suit’s allegations by Peter Paul, the Hollywood dot com millionaire Bill Clinton convinced to donate more than $1.2 million (according to the DOJ prosecutors and the FBI) to Hillary’s Senate campaign as part of a post White House business deal with Bill.</p>
<p>The media - except for World Net Daily- has also suspiciously refused to report on Hillary’s last FEC report regarding her 2000 Senate campaign, filed in January 30, 2006. In a secret settlement of an FEC complaint by the plaintiff in Paul v Clinton, Peter Paul, the FEC fined Hillary’s campaign $35,000 for hiding more than $720,000 in donations from Paul, and it required Hillary’s campaign to file a 4th amended FEC report.</p>
<p>In that report Hillary and her campaign again hid Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to her campaign and falsely attributed $250,000 as being donated by Paul’s partner, Spider Man creator Stan Lee, who swore in a video taped deposition he never gave Hillary or her campaign any money.</p>
<p>Lee did testify to trading $100,000 checks with Paul to make it appear he gave $100,000 to Hillary’s campaign (admission of a felony) but none of that has been reported by the “overly critical” media!</p>
<p>Where is the outrage from Obama that the press is engaging in a double standard relating to his possible role in the Rezko trial and his refunding the $85,000 contributed to his campaign by Rezko- which Obama has always admitted taking. The media makes no mention of Hillary’s role as a witness in Bill’s fraud trial for defrauding Hillary’s largest donor- and Hillary’s refusal to refund the $1.2 million she illegally received from Paul, which she has denied taking from Paul ever since the Washington Post asked her about Paul and his felony convictions from the 1970’s before her first Senate election in 2000?</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.Hillcap.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.Hillcap.org</a> for proof of Hillary Clinton commiting crimes. The evidence that could have put Hillary Clinton in jail for 5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmartDoc</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/03/16/obama-the-wright-wing-conspiracy/#comment-63790</link>
		<dc:creator>SmartDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/03/16/obama-the-wright-wing-conspiracy/#comment-63790</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the Clintons' will blame the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" for doing empty suit Obama in, as they stand there with blood on their hands!

I must confess I know nothing about Obama.  What very little I do know, is being rapidly swept under the carpet by the Obama staff.

That is never a good sign. Last time we got a a President we knew nothing about shouting "Change," we got Jimmy Carter, the worst President and the worst ex-President in US history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the Clintons&#8217; will blame the &#8220;Vast Right Wing Conspiracy&#8221; for doing empty suit Obama in, as they stand there with blood on their hands!</p>
<p>I must confess I know nothing about Obama.  What very little I do know, is being rapidly swept under the carpet by the Obama staff.</p>
<p>That is never a good sign. Last time we got a a President we knew nothing about shouting &#8220;Change,&#8221; we got Jimmy Carter, the worst President and the worst ex-President in US history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Iovino</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/03/16/obama-the-wright-wing-conspiracy/#comment-63739</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Iovino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/03/16/obama-the-wright-wing-conspiracy/#comment-63739</guid>
		<description>I'm a conservative Republican who has only voted for two Democrats ever--Jimmy Carter and Eliot Spitzer--both of which I regretted.  Still, I think Obama is OK here, unless we see video of him cheering while Wright espouses hate, bigotry and idiocy.

We all have friends and relatives who say outrageous things from time to time. I won't throw any of my friends under the bus and I don't expect Obama or any other politician to do so, either. If they aren't on your staff, then just tell me you don't agree with their position or statements and show me that you don't agree by your actions, and as far as I'm concerned the issue is over.

If I disassociated myself from every friend and relative who is a bit crazy, I'd be a lonely, lonely, man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a conservative Republican who has only voted for two Democrats ever&#8211;Jimmy Carter and Eliot Spitzer&#8211;both of which I regretted.  Still, I think Obama is OK here, unless we see video of him cheering while Wright espouses hate, bigotry and idiocy.</p>
<p>We all have friends and relatives who say outrageous things from time to time. I won&#8217;t throw any of my friends under the bus and I don&#8217;t expect Obama or any other politician to do so, either. If they aren&#8217;t on your staff, then just tell me you don&#8217;t agree with their position or statements and show me that you don&#8217;t agree by your actions, and as far as I&#8217;m concerned the issue is over.</p>
<p>If I disassociated myself from every friend and relative who is a bit crazy, I&#8217;d be a lonely, lonely, man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
