PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES & HONESTY

I have always been skeptical of public opinion polls, and I still take them with a truckload of salt, but the results of this Gallup poll warrant some attention. It would appear that the public regards John McCain as the most honest of the candidates:

David Catron

It’s no surprise, of course, that Clinton comes in WAY behind McCain and Obama on this question. And Obama’s rating on this question is likely to erode after yesterday’s transparently disingenuous speech.

In fact, Thomas Sowell suggests that the speech confirms Obama’s essential dishonesty. He’s not buying the tale that the Illinois senator was shocked by Jeremiah Wright’s repeated exercises in hate speech:

There was no way that he didn’t know about Jeremiah Wright’s anti-American and racist diatribes from the pulpit.

Sowell goes on to say:

Someone once said that a con man’s job is not to convince skeptics but to enable people to continue to believe what they already want to believe. Accordingly, Obama’s Philadelphia speech — a theatrical masterpiece — will probably reassure most Democrats and some other Obama supporters.

In the end, Obama is just as dishonest as Clinton. He is, however, a more convincing liar. It remains to seen if that talent will convince anyone other than hopelessly besotted Kool-Aid drinkers.

UPDATE:

And speaking of Kool-Aid drinkers, CNN’s political “analysts” responded to the Obama speech as if their lines had been written by the Senator’s speechwriters. Peter Chowka highlights some particularly nauseating excerpts at the American Thinker, including this cringe-maker from David Gergen:

In my judgment, it was the best speech of this campaign by anybody, eloquently and thoughtfully addressing the issue of race, and also showing us a great deal about Barack Obama as a leader.

This kind of gushing further vitiates CNN’s credibility as an objective news source, but it does provide one benefit for the erstwhile cable news leader: no one can accuse it of being the ”Clinton News Network” anymore.

Comments 4

  1. Marc Brown wrote:

    The poll finds that Clinton is on top for a clear vision of your future and a plan for solving your problems. That’s the best candidate.

    Posted 19 Mar 2008 at 4:34 pm
  2. Joe C. wrote:

    Having a clear vision and a plan doesn’t mean that you got it right. GWB is a prime example of this.

    I make a point not to follow politics that closely, but I do know that another 4-8 years of the Clintons in the White House is not going to help us. I really don’t know how anyone can get up in the morning and think that:

    Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton

    is a great idea. Enough already!

    Posted 20 Mar 2008 at 9:41 am
  3. Marc Brown wrote:

    ‘Having a clear vision and a plan doesn’t mean that you got it right. GWB is a prime example of this.’

    Sorry - GWB had no vision and no plan. Do you count Iraq? I think of all the three having a woman at the top will do best for your country.

    Posted 20 Mar 2008 at 10:57 am
  4. Joe C. wrote:

    Marc,

    I take it you didn’t follow the 2004 presidential election. At all. You’re confusing disagreeing with GWB for him having “no vision and no plan”.

    The “having a woman at the top” statement is irrational, but quite representative of the screwed up way in which politics are now played. Everyone is so caught up in irrelevant aspects of politicians, such as their gender, race, stupid things that they’ve said, or what they like to do on weekends that they neglect the most pressing inquiry: Can this person formulate good policy or can they not?

    Posted 20 Mar 2008 at 12:33 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *