<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KENNEDY: WHY WASN&#8217;T HE FLOWN TO EUROPE?</title>
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe C.</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-159097</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-159097</guid>
		<description>"The Royal Family are treated privately outside of the NHS. The vast majority of British people get equitable NHS care."

If the NHS is so wonderful, why isn't the Royal Family using it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Royal Family are treated privately outside of the NHS. The vast majority of British people get equitable NHS care.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the NHS is so wonderful, why isn&#8217;t the Royal Family using it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-158914</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-158914</guid>
		<description>"equitable" - eq·ui·ta·ble : adj. Denying care fairly and equally to all concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;equitable&#8221; - eq·ui·ta·ble : adj. Denying care fairly and equally to all concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-158518</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 07:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-158518</guid>
		<description>'Does your run-of-the-mill chav get the same level of treatment as the Queen or her slightly demented grandson Harry?'

The Royal Family are treated privately outside of the NHS. The vast majority of British people get equitable NHS care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Does your run-of-the-mill chav get the same level of treatment as the Queen or her slightly demented grandson Harry?&#8217;</p>
<p>The Royal Family are treated privately outside of the NHS. The vast majority of British people get equitable NHS care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe C.</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-157664</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-157664</guid>
		<description>"So all 47 million uninsured and the many underinsured are treated as well as Ted Kennedy?"

Does your run-of-the-mill chav get the same level of treatment as the Queen or her slightly demented grandson Harry? The egalitarian society you envision lives exclusively in your head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So all 47 million uninsured and the many underinsured are treated as well as Ted Kennedy?&#8221;</p>
<p>Does your run-of-the-mill chav get the same level of treatment as the Queen or her slightly demented grandson Harry? The egalitarian society you envision lives exclusively in your head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-148980</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-148980</guid>
		<description>"Anyone can get a medically-necessary scan at a major trauma center. "

So all 47 million uninsured and the many underinsured are treated as well as Ted Kennedy? Do they also all get regular screening? Is no one - repeat no one - left with unpayable bills despite being insured?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anyone can get a medically-necessary scan at a major trauma center. &#8221;</p>
<p>So all 47 million uninsured and the many underinsured are treated as well as Ted Kennedy? Do they also all get regular screening? Is no one - repeat no one - left with unpayable bills despite being insured?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe C.</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-148731</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-148731</guid>
		<description>"But in the US they are not used as much per machine and of course many more tests are done owing to the worried well/defensive medicine, driving up your costs."

Tell that to the poor Canucks who have to drive to places like Buffalo for their imaging. Maybe your NHS could afford more modern imaging equipment if they weren't throwing money away on useless crap like a homeopathy hospital.

"And of course access and short waits are prioritised for those with the best health insurance."

Nonsense. Anyone can get a medically-necessary scan at a major trauma center. My wife got $3,000 worth of CT imaging without as much as an insurance card because her employer at the time was too lazy to fill out the paperwork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But in the US they are not used as much per machine and of course many more tests are done owing to the worried well/defensive medicine, driving up your costs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tell that to the poor Canucks who have to drive to places like Buffalo for their imaging. Maybe your NHS could afford more modern imaging equipment if they weren&#8217;t throwing money away on useless crap like a homeopathy hospital.</p>
<p>&#8220;And of course access and short waits are prioritised for those with the best health insurance.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nonsense. Anyone can get a medically-necessary scan at a major trauma center. My wife got $3,000 worth of CT imaging without as much as an insurance card because her employer at the time was too lazy to fill out the paperwork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-148471</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-148471</guid>
		<description>I agree that the US (and Japan) have the highest per head ratio of MRI scanners. But in the US they are not used as much per machine and of course many more tests are done owing to the worried well/defensive medicine, driving up your costs. And of course access and short waits are prioritised for those with the best health insurance. For every horror story you can find from Canada, I can give you 10 from the US about people struggling desperately to get care for conditions such as cancer. But you know that, I'm sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the US (and Japan) have the highest per head ratio of MRI scanners. But in the US they are not used as much per machine and of course many more tests are done owing to the worried well/defensive medicine, driving up your costs. And of course access and short waits are prioritised for those with the best health insurance. For every horror story you can find from Canada, I can give you 10 from the US about people struggling desperately to get care for conditions such as cancer. But you know that, I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-148125</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-148125</guid>
		<description>Kennedy has the same "government provided" health care that John McCain has. It is the best in the world, if you're a senator or rich. 

You confuse the issue, medicine in the U.S. is the best, no doubt, for the wealthy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kennedy has the same &#8220;government provided&#8221; health care that John McCain has. It is the best in the world, if you&#8217;re a senator or rich. </p>
<p>You confuse the issue, medicine in the U.S. is the best, no doubt, for the wealthy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-147399</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-147399</guid>
		<description>"Ha ha - so after a seizure the docs all shrug and say ‘he’ll snap out of it’. What nonsense. "

No, he'd get a CT, which could easily have missed the lesion. Then he'd take anti-seizure medications until the seizures became intractable or some other neurological event, probably something that looked like a stroke, occurred. Then he'd be rescanned, and the CT would easily identify the 2cm mass lesion. Then the provicial authority would pat themselves on their collective backs for having saved a few dollars (canadian) on a test that would not have changed the outcome. Of course, it might not have been a glioma after all, but since it was, rationing the MRI was the  "correct" thing to have done. Nice rectrospectoscope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ha ha - so after a seizure the docs all shrug and say ‘he’ll snap out of it’. What nonsense. &#8221;</p>
<p>No, he&#8217;d get a CT, which could easily have missed the lesion. Then he&#8217;d take anti-seizure medications until the seizures became intractable or some other neurological event, probably something that looked like a stroke, occurred. Then he&#8217;d be rescanned, and the CT would easily identify the 2cm mass lesion. Then the provicial authority would pat themselves on their collective backs for having saved a few dollars (canadian) on a test that would not have changed the outcome. Of course, it might not have been a glioma after all, but since it was, rationing the MRI was the  &#8220;correct&#8221; thing to have done. Nice rectrospectoscope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe C.</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-147397</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/05/21/kennedy-why-wasnt-he-flown-to-europe/#comment-147397</guid>
		<description>"If you diagnosis a lot of slow growing cancer early of course you boost the 5 yr rate but not the long term survival."

Yeah, all that fancy early detection of cancer stuff is just a big greedy capitalist con.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you diagnosis a lot of slow growing cancer early of course you boost the 5 yr rate but not the long term survival.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, all that fancy early detection of cancer stuff is just a big greedy capitalist con.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
