CANADA’S HEALTH SYSTEM DISSED BY ITS DAD

Claude Castonguay is known as “the father of Quebec Medicare.” However, as David Gratzer points out in IBD, Castonguay can be more accurately described as the “father” of the Canadian single-payer system:

Back in the 1960s, Castonguay chaired a Canadian government committee studying health reform and recommended that his home province of Quebec adopt government-administered health care … Castonguay’s work triggered a domino effect across the country, until eventually his ideas were implemented from coast to coast.

Now, however, Dad is not happy with the way his child turned out:

Four decades later, as the chairman of a government committee reviewing Quebec health care this year, Castonguay concluded that the system is in “crisis.”

And how does Castonguay propose to get Canadian health care back on track?

We are proposing to give a greater role to the private sector so that people can exercise freedom of choice.

That’s right. While our leading politicians advocate turning more and more of U.S. health care over to the government, the father of Canadian health care is advocating less government involvement. Which prompts Gratzer to ask:

If Claude Castonguay is abandoning ship, why should Americans bother climbing on board?

Why indeed.

Comments 4

  1. Marc Brown wrote:

    Would that be the same David Gratzer who would flunk stats 101 re that prostate story? “You would get an F in epidemiology at Johns Hopkins if you did that calculation,” said John Hopkins professor Gerard Anderson.

    Posted 27 Jun 2008 at 1:48 pm
  2. Catron wrote:

    Two points, Marc:

    1) Your reference to “stats 101″ is a giant, stinky red herring that you’re introducing in lieu of an intelligent response to the post.

    2) Gerard Anderson’s credibilty was long ago compromised by his transparent political agenda. Gratzer’s stats were, in fact, correct (as he explains here).

    Posted 27 Jun 2008 at 2:15 pm
  3. Rich wrote:

    Anderson was recently paraphased as having said that “high medical bills are the second most common reason for personal bankruptcies.”

    ( http://www.philly.com/philly/business/20080608_The_cost_of_hospital_care_is_difficult_to_pin_down.html )

    A myth long since debunked. http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/07/19/medical-bankruptcy-myth-debunked-yet-again/

    So much for his credibility as an authority on statistical matters.

    Posted 27 Jun 2008 at 4:15 pm
  4. SmartDoc wrote:

    “We are proposing to give a greater role to the private sector so that people can exercise freedom of choice.”

    Freedom of choice: that which liberalism hates above all else.

    Posted 28 Jun 2008 at 8:20 am

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *