<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HOW MANY DIE FOR LACK OF INSURANCE?</title>
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/23/how-many-die-for-lack-of-insurance/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/23/how-many-die-for-lack-of-insurance/#comment-434413</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/23/how-many-die-for-lack-of-insurance/#comment-434413</guid>
		<description>A doctor has to treat you if you have a life threatening condition.  You work out a payment plan at a later date...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A doctor has to treat you if you have a life threatening condition.  You work out a payment plan at a later date&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teqjack</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/23/how-many-die-for-lack-of-insurance/#comment-325221</link>
		<dc:creator>teqjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/23/how-many-die-for-lack-of-insurance/#comment-325221</guid>
		<description>Massachusetts has had "universal" health insurance - and fines if you don't buy it - for a couple of years, and is serving as the model for proposals across the country. Uh... 
 
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/09/hows-that-working.html 
As this third wealthiest state in the country focused its resources on ensuring all of its residents were insured, it quickly became apparent that the state’s estimates of what it would cost taxpayers had been underestimated by more than five-fold. The program also created an enormous set of new bureaucracies (no less than ten new agencies, six financial-management funds, and three new programs) to establish, oversee and enforce... and proved more expensive and less efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massachusetts has had &#8220;universal&#8221; health insurance - and fines if you don&#8217;t buy it - for a couple of years, and is serving as the model for proposals across the country. Uh&#8230; </p>
<p><a href="http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/09/hows-that-working.html" rel="nofollow">http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/09/hows-that-working.html</a><br />
As this third wealthiest state in the country focused its resources on ensuring all of its residents were insured, it quickly became apparent that the state’s estimates of what it would cost taxpayers had been underestimated by more than five-fold. The program also created an enormous set of new bureaucracies (no less than ten new agencies, six financial-management funds, and three new programs) to establish, oversee and enforce&#8230; and proved more expensive and less efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Lansberry</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/23/how-many-die-for-lack-of-insurance/#comment-324965</link>
		<dc:creator>James Lansberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/23/how-many-die-for-lack-of-insurance/#comment-324965</guid>
		<description>Of course on top of this, even if their number is correct, 5-15x this many people die from medical errors or preventable infections.  You know, from seeking care?

So their argument falls apart even if you grant it.  Statistically these numbers are all small and they want to use poor policy "solutions" that will cause new and different problems.  A little de-regulation and these 18,000 people could get care for cash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course on top of this, even if their number is correct, 5-15x this many people die from medical errors or preventable infections.  You know, from seeking care?</p>
<p>So their argument falls apart even if you grant it.  Statistically these numbers are all small and they want to use poor policy &#8220;solutions&#8221; that will cause new and different problems.  A little de-regulation and these 18,000 people could get care for cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

