<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PARLIAMENT OF MORONS</title>
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-330335</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 10:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-330335</guid>
		<description>'An army of democrat party felons have conducted the greatest theft in the history of the world. They all made enormous ill-gotten wealth: from bought and paid for politicians, to crooked mortgage brokers, to a thouroughly corrupted Fannie Mae leadership, all down the line. Obama, Dodd, Garelick, the Clintons: how the money rolled in.'

So a sound case for heavy regulation then. Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;An army of democrat party felons have conducted the greatest theft in the history of the world. They all made enormous ill-gotten wealth: from bought and paid for politicians, to crooked mortgage brokers, to a thouroughly corrupted Fannie Mae leadership, all down the line. Obama, Dodd, Garelick, the Clintons: how the money rolled in.&#8217;</p>
<p>So a sound case for heavy regulation then. Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmartDoc</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329919</link>
		<dc:creator>SmartDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329919</guid>
		<description>An army of democrat party felons have conducted the greatest theft in the history of the world. They all made enormous ill-gotten wealth: from bought and paid for politicians, to crooked mortgage brokers, to a thouroughly corrupted Fannie Mae leadership, all down the line.  Obama, Dodd, Garelick, the Clintons: how the money rolled in.

And we are going to bail them out? 

The $700 billion is totally wasted since no change is made in the democrat party laws mandating bad motgages by banks.

Any surviving banks are all doomed to failure for precisely the same reason that the previous banks all failed.

And this the army of criminals who want to get its evil hands on health care money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An army of democrat party felons have conducted the greatest theft in the history of the world. They all made enormous ill-gotten wealth: from bought and paid for politicians, to crooked mortgage brokers, to a thouroughly corrupted Fannie Mae leadership, all down the line.  Obama, Dodd, Garelick, the Clintons: how the money rolled in.</p>
<p>And we are going to bail them out? </p>
<p>The $700 billion is totally wasted since no change is made in the democrat party laws mandating bad motgages by banks.</p>
<p>Any surviving banks are all doomed to failure for precisely the same reason that the previous banks all failed.</p>
<p>And this the army of criminals who want to get its evil hands on health care money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc B.</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329884</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329884</guid>
		<description>'His solution, I suspect, is much more regulation.'

Too right - what you don't seem to realise is that the bulk of the lax sub-prime lending was not in the most regulated parts of the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;His solution, I suspect, is much more regulation.&#8217;</p>
<p>Too right - what you don&#8217;t seem to realise is that the bulk of the lax sub-prime lending was not in the most regulated parts of the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard M.</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329755</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329755</guid>
		<description>I found the Wapo piece unconvincing.  The writer never attempts to place the blame for the housing bubble where it belongs.  He makes reference to "poorly regulated mortgage debt."  His solution, I suspect, is much more regulation.  He says, "the free market and Wild West capitalism of recent decades will be forever changed."  Really?  I missed it.  He must be talking about the late 1800's.  

This, I think, is a much better explanation of the current difficulties:  http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/29/miron.bailout/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the Wapo piece unconvincing.  The writer never attempts to place the blame for the housing bubble where it belongs.  He makes reference to &#8220;poorly regulated mortgage debt.&#8221;  His solution, I suspect, is much more regulation.  He says, &#8220;the free market and Wild West capitalism of recent decades will be forever changed.&#8221;  Really?  I missed it.  He must be talking about the late 1800&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>This, I think, is a much better explanation of the current difficulties:  <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/29/miron.bailout/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/29/miron.bailout/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catron</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329638</link>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329638</guid>
		<description>"Why does spending 700B we don’t have instead of waiting for the market to pick up the pieces make sense to you?"

This is like asking why we do bypass surgery instead of letting the body fix itself. The heart of the system is about to stop pumping. Ideology won't keep it going. If you can deal with more than 100 words, here's a good Wapo piece that explains the situation:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/23/AR2008092302322.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why does spending 700B we don’t have instead of waiting for the market to pick up the pieces make sense to you?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is like asking why we do bypass surgery instead of letting the body fix itself. The heart of the system is about to stop pumping. Ideology won&#8217;t keep it going. If you can deal with more than 100 words, here&#8217;s a good Wapo piece that explains the situation:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/23/AR2008092302322.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/23/AR2008092302322.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Lansberry</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329550</link>
		<dc:creator>James Lansberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329550</guid>
		<description>Marc:

These weren't deregulated free-marketeers.  Fannie and Freddie were federally sponsored corps.  They had lots of federal money and regulation already.  And they're at the core of this mess.

Catron:
I'm surprised to see you coming out in favor of a bailout.  In 100 words, why does spending 700B we don't have instead of waiting for the market to pick up the pieces make sense to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc:</p>
<p>These weren&#8217;t deregulated free-marketeers.  Fannie and Freddie were federally sponsored corps.  They had lots of federal money and regulation already.  And they&#8217;re at the core of this mess.</p>
<p>Catron:<br />
I&#8217;m surprised to see you coming out in favor of a bailout.  In 100 words, why does spending 700B we don&#8217;t have instead of waiting for the market to pick up the pieces make sense to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329515</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329515</guid>
		<description>"A majority of Republicans voted against the bailout."

You may have noticed, Mr. Brown, that the Democrats have a majority in the House. They could have passed this bill without a single Republican vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A majority of Republicans voted against the bailout.&#8221;</p>
<p>You may have noticed, Mr. Brown, that the Democrats have a majority in the House. They could have passed this bill without a single Republican vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329364</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/09/29/parliament-of-morons/#comment-329364</guid>
		<description>Three points.

1 A majority of Republicans voted against the bailout.  A majority of Democrats voted for it.

2 Surely you are not in favour of bailouts.

3 Do you honestly think most people want their healthcare in the hands of deregulated free marketeers like these bankers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three points.</p>
<p>1 A majority of Republicans voted against the bailout.  A majority of Democrats voted for it.</p>
<p>2 Surely you are not in favour of bailouts.</p>
<p>3 Do you honestly think most people want their healthcare in the hands of deregulated free marketeers like these bankers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
