<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHEN BAD POLLS GO GOOD</title>
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/10/19/when-bad-polls-go-good/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ECM</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/10/19/when-bad-polls-go-good/#comment-448528</link>
		<dc:creator>ECM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/10/19/when-bad-polls-go-good/#comment-448528</guid>
		<description>If Sullivan is for them (and let's not kid ourselves: he'll be anti-*insert R here* no matter who gets the nom--especially Huck) that's, generally, a good indicator of who will likely be electoral poison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Sullivan is for them (and let&#8217;s not kid ourselves: he&#8217;ll be anti-*insert R here* no matter who gets the nom&#8211;especially Huck) that&#8217;s, generally, a good indicator of who will likely be electoral poison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
