<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE ODD LIBELS OF ANDREW SULLIVAN</title>
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Northeast Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449402</link>
		<dc:creator>Northeast Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449402</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;NE Elizabeth: Wrong. What do you read or understand that tells you this statement is not true?&lt;/i&gt;

K.Kiley,

I'll lead you through this in baby steps, which you obviously require.  First, give me the link the document that you allege contains the word "certificate" on it, and tell me when it was created and which state officials vouched for it.  Caution:  No word other than "certificate" -- exact match -- is acceptable.  Also, link me to the birth announcement with Barack Obama's name on it.  Again, his name MUST appear on it, no substitutes!  Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>NE Elizabeth: Wrong. What do you read or understand that tells you this statement is not true?</i></p>
<p>K.Kiley,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll lead you through this in baby steps, which you obviously require.  First, give me the link the document that you allege contains the word &#8220;certificate&#8221; on it, and tell me when it was created and which state officials vouched for it.  Caution:  No word other than &#8220;certificate&#8221; &#8212; exact match &#8212; is acceptable.  Also, link me to the birth announcement with Barack Obama&#8217;s name on it.  Again, his name MUST appear on it, no substitutes!  Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catron</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449404</link>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449404</guid>
		<description>OK, Jim C, let's try this one more time. The WSJ piece doesn't provide any more names than Sullivan.

As the Riehl post and countlesss other posts and stories make obvious, the "sources close to the McCain Campaign" are the same losers who sabotaged Palin during the campaign.

Otherwise, there would be NO REASON for Sullivan or the WSJ to keep them anonymous. If their names were revealed, it would be obvious to everyone that they have no credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Jim C, let&#8217;s try this one more time. The WSJ piece doesn&#8217;t provide any more names than Sullivan.</p>
<p>As the Riehl post and countlesss other posts and stories make obvious, the &#8220;sources close to the McCain Campaign&#8221; are the same losers who sabotaged Palin during the campaign.</p>
<p>Otherwise, there would be NO REASON for Sullivan or the WSJ to keep them anonymous. If their names were revealed, it would be obvious to everyone that they have no credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim C.</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449400</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449400</guid>
		<description>Damn those crazed liberal commies at the Wall Street Journal!

Didn't anyone else see the Katie Couric interview?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn those crazed liberal commies at the Wall Street Journal!</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t anyone else see the Katie Couric interview?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thames</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449390</link>
		<dc:creator>Thames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449390</guid>
		<description>@Diane:

Palin "destroyed?" I don't think so. She's winning from all angles. Her influence and book sales are sky-rocketing while your side is crashing and burning

SELF DESTRUCT: The Dems, with their corrupt practices brought by Obama’s Chicago thugs, ARE THE ONES SELF-DESTRUCTING. 

Have you seen their poll numbers lately? They are all going south. Have you watched the President's approval ratings plummet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Diane:</p>
<p>Palin &#8220;destroyed?&#8221; I don&#8217;t think so. She&#8217;s winning from all angles. Her influence and book sales are sky-rocketing while your side is crashing and burning</p>
<p>SELF DESTRUCT: The Dems, with their corrupt practices brought by Obama’s Chicago thugs, ARE THE ONES SELF-DESTRUCTING. </p>
<p>Have you seen their poll numbers lately? They are all going south. Have you watched the President&#8217;s approval ratings plummet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449376</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449376</guid>
		<description>palin destroyed herself.
She was unqualified to be VP and if you listen to her fellow Alaskans, she was not a great gov. either.
She has a history of threatening people with legal actions when she does not like what they say.
Let her destroy herself. She has nothing to offer except herself as a victim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>palin destroyed herself.<br />
She was unqualified to be VP and if you listen to her fellow Alaskans, she was not a great gov. either.<br />
She has a history of threatening people with legal actions when she does not like what they say.<br />
Let her destroy herself. She has nothing to offer except herself as a victim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catron</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449378</link>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449378</guid>
		<description>ECM, you should have read some of the ones I deleted!

Fortunately, these folks only represent about 2% of the people who read this particular post, and many of the other readers came in from other sources (like Bloglines, etc.)

So, hopefully, the other 98% are a lttle more rational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ECM, you should have read some of the ones I deleted!</p>
<p>Fortunately, these folks only represent about 2% of the people who read this particular post, and many of the other readers came in from other sources (like Bloglines, etc.)</p>
<p>So, hopefully, the other 98% are a lttle more rational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ECM</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449377</link>
		<dc:creator>ECM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449377</guid>
		<description>Congrats on the flood of traffic from the loons that nest at the Daily Dish, Catron! Too bad they were all birthed from eggs w/ thin shells and since Mamma Sullivan only feeds her chicks  a steady diet of irrationality, ad hominem, and non sequitur I guess you can't expect too much in the way of reasoned debate. (Then again, if you're like some of these posters and believe that the status of Palin's vagina is 'fair game', well, you were already pretty nuts to begin with.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on the flood of traffic from the loons that nest at the Daily Dish, Catron! Too bad they were all birthed from eggs w/ thin shells and since Mamma Sullivan only feeds her chicks  a steady diet of irrationality, ad hominem, and non sequitur I guess you can&#8217;t expect too much in the way of reasoned debate. (Then again, if you&#8217;re like some of these posters and believe that the status of Palin&#8217;s vagina is &#8216;fair game&#8217;, well, you were already pretty nuts to begin with.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Kiley</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449375</link>
		<dc:creator>K Kiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449375</guid>
		<description>NE Elizabeth:  Wrong. What do you read or understand that tells you this statement is not true? Show us the research, if you can.
You're "requiring" B-Rob to "prove" what is already proven is further evidence of birther-type condescension, paranoia, and hubris.  If you know so much, spell it out here so it can be disproved. You and Catron deserve each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NE Elizabeth:  Wrong. What do you read or understand that tells you this statement is not true? Show us the research, if you can.<br />
You&#8217;re &#8220;requiring&#8221; B-Rob to &#8220;prove&#8221; what is already proven is further evidence of birther-type condescension, paranoia, and hubris.  If you know so much, spell it out here so it can be disproved. You and Catron deserve each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Northeast Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449374</link>
		<dc:creator>Northeast Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449374</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The birthers have an official Hawaii birth certificate that has been vouched for by that state, plus contemporaneous newspaper birth announcements&lt;/i&gt;

Wrong.  Do some research and repost a corrected comment. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The birthers have an official Hawaii birth certificate that has been vouched for by that state, plus contemporaneous newspaper birth announcements</i></p>
<p>Wrong.  Do some research and repost a corrected comment. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skippy-san</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449364</link>
		<dc:creator>Skippy-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2009/11/13/the-odd-libels-of-andrew-sullivan/#comment-449364</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;"McCain minions who sabotaged Palin during last year’s presidential campaign"&lt;/em&gt;

You have completely missed the point. It was Palin's responisbility to support McCain-not the other way around. However, if there is one thing that is true, Sarah Palin is all about one thing-herself.

Exposing her as the fraud that she is is what Sullivan has done and had Palin sued she would have lost because Sullivan has printed and asked questions based on evidence in the public domain. Palin could have answered them-but chose not to.

Palin deserves all of the scorn she gets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;McCain minions who sabotaged Palin during last year’s presidential campaign&#8221;</em></p>
<p>You have completely missed the point. It was Palin&#8217;s responisbility to support McCain-not the other way around. However, if there is one thing that is true, Sarah Palin is all about one thing-herself.</p>
<p>Exposing her as the fraud that she is is what Sullivan has done and had Palin sued she would have lost because Sullivan has printed and asked questions based on evidence in the public domain. Palin could have answered them-but chose not to.</p>
<p>Palin deserves all of the scorn she gets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
