Comments on: THE MEANING OF RON PAUL’S CPAC WIN: NADA http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/02/21/what-ron-pauls-cpac-win-means-nada/ Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:30:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Student under 25 http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/02/21/what-ron-pauls-cpac-win-means-nada/#comment-458482 Student under 25 Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:28:24 +0000 http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/02/21/what-ron-pauls-cpac-win-means-nada/#comment-458482 When you old geezers are six feet under, and us students have become old geezers ourselves, we will elect nothing but Ron Pauls, Rand Pauls, and Debra Medinas into power. And the conservative movement will be better off (not to mention far more conservative than the current big government nanny state loving bloodthirsty neocons currently infecting the GOP). When you old geezers are six feet under, and us students have become old geezers ourselves, we will elect nothing but Ron Pauls, Rand Pauls, and Debra Medinas into power. And the conservative movement will be better off (not to mention far more conservative than the current big government nanny state loving bloodthirsty neocons currently infecting the GOP).

]]> By: Matt Horn CBC http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/02/21/what-ron-pauls-cpac-win-means-nada/#comment-458322 Matt Horn CBC Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:42:02 +0000 http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/02/21/what-ron-pauls-cpac-win-means-nada/#comment-458322 I'm no Paul nut job, but he does look like the only conservative in that bunch besides Sarah. I’m no Paul nut job, but he does look like the only conservative in that bunch besides Sarah.

]]> By: ECM http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/02/21/what-ron-pauls-cpac-win-means-nada/#comment-458300 ECM Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:09:40 +0000 http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/02/21/what-ron-pauls-cpac-win-means-nada/#comment-458300 <i>So, why did you feel obligated to tell us this?</i> Uh, because it doesn't, uh, mean much of anything?? Yes, I know, it's a hard concept to grasp... So, why did you feel obligated to tell us this?

Uh, because it doesn’t, uh, mean much of anything?? Yes, I know, it’s a hard concept to grasp…

]]> By: Ben http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/02/21/what-ron-pauls-cpac-win-means-nada/#comment-458294 Ben Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:13:28 +0000 http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/02/21/what-ron-pauls-cpac-win-means-nada/#comment-458294 "isolationist, anti-semitic, gold bugs and truthers" Must be nice to have such limber a mind to perform those over-generalizing mental and/or ethical gymnastics. “isolationist, anti-semitic, gold bugs and truthers” Must be nice to have such limber a mind to perform those over-generalizing mental and/or ethical gymnastics.

]]> By: Robert http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/02/21/what-ron-pauls-cpac-win-means-nada/#comment-458292 Robert Sun, 21 Feb 2010 05:56:30 +0000 http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/02/21/what-ron-pauls-cpac-win-means-nada/#comment-458292 So, why did you feel obligated to tell us this? "...doesn't mean much of anything." You warmongering liberals and neo-cons are hilarious! So, why did you feel obligated to tell us this?
“…doesn’t mean much of anything.” You warmongering liberals and neo-cons are hilarious!

]]>