<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE &#8220;OVERSIGHT&#8221; THAT MAY KILL OBAMACARE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/11/27/the-oversight-that-may-kill-obamacare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/11/27/the-oversight-that-may-kill-obamacare/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 21:39:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Hsieh</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/11/27/the-oversight-that-may-kill-obamacare/#comment-462871</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hsieh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/11/27/the-oversight-that-may-kill-obamacare/#comment-462871</guid>
		<description>David: I hope you&#039;re right.  But according to Peter Suderman, the SCOTUS might not actually follow that reasoning.

http://reason.com/blog/2010/11/30/if-obamacares-individual-manda

This phrase in particular caught my eye:
&quot;...the Court &#039;presumes severability unless non-severability is explicitly specified.&#039;&quot;

So even though it is is a massive oversight by the Congress, given how politicized this issue is, I don&#039;t necessarily count on the SCOTUS to do the right thing here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David: I hope you&#8217;re right.  But according to Peter Suderman, the SCOTUS might not actually follow that reasoning.</p>
<p><a href="http://reason.com/blog/2010/11/30/if-obamacares-individual-manda" rel="nofollow">http://reason.com/blog/2010/11/30/if-obamacares-individual-manda</a></p>
<p>This phrase in particular caught my eye:<br />
&#8220;&#8230;the Court &#8216;presumes severability unless non-severability is explicitly specified.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>So even though it is is a massive oversight by the Congress, given how politicized this issue is, I don&#8217;t necessarily count on the SCOTUS to do the right thing here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ECM</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/11/27/the-oversight-that-may-kill-obamacare/#comment-462782</link>
		<dc:creator>ECM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/11/27/the-oversight-that-may-kill-obamacare/#comment-462782</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d think, in a 2000 page bill, that literally everything would be in it (including a complete version of the King James Bible)--what a bunch of incompetent clowns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d think, in a 2000 page bill, that literally everything would be in it (including a complete version of the King James Bible)&#8211;what a bunch of incompetent clowns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

