<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: END-OF-LIFE COUNSELING: THE GOVERNMENT&#8217;S CONFLICT OF INTEREST</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/12/27/end-of-life-counseling-the-governments-conflict-of-interest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/12/27/end-of-life-counseling-the-governments-conflict-of-interest/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 21:39:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wakefield Tolbert</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/12/27/end-of-life-counseling-the-governments-conflict-of-interest/#comment-463864</link>
		<dc:creator>Wakefield Tolbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/12/27/end-of-life-counseling-the-governments-conflict-of-interest/#comment-463864</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you make of this â€śMedicare for Allâ€? mantra? Seems to me prohibitively expensive, since my understanding is that much of Medicare service is outsourced to help control costs, and is currently confined to a portion of the population, whereas the other portion helps chip into pay; an arrangement that gets radically reworked if you attempt to have all 330 million of us under the Medicare banner.</p>
<p>Also, speaking of claims denial, what is your take, or rather solution, to the very real perception that regardless of what one thinks of the â€śDeath Panelsâ€? charge against O-Care and claimed as the Orwellian nightmare scenario under Euro-Canadian care, we actually have that NOW in US care even IF you have fantastic health insurance coverage?  </p>
<p>How?  Well, insurance companies no more than government will pay for granny forever to â€śwind downâ€? the clock on an IV or dialysis tree. They, like government, donâ€™t have endless funds to plunk down on the old folks or preemie babies, those with terminal illnesses, et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/12/27/end-of-life-counseling-the-governments-conflict-of-interest/#comment-463089</link>
		<dc:creator>glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/12/27/end-of-life-counseling-the-governments-conflict-of-interest/#comment-463089</guid>
		<description>Ludicrous logic.  The government is not involved - it is only allowing doctors to be paid for their time.  Seems to me that families should know the many options involved so THEY can decide.  This is simply an issue of individuals receiving information on which THEY can make decisions - and doctors being paid for their time.  Let&#039;s stop politicizing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ludicrous logic.  The government is not involved &#8211; it is only allowing doctors to be paid for their time.  Seems to me that families should know the many options involved so THEY can decide.  This is simply an issue of individuals receiving information on which THEY can make decisions &#8211; and doctors being paid for their time.  Let&#8217;s stop politicizing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

