AZ SHOOTING PROMPTS DEM TO DEMAND THAT GOP CHANGE NAME OF OCARE REPEAL BILL

The Democrats really are utterly shameless. If they can think of a way—any way—to exploit Saturday’s horror show, they will not hesitate to do so. Nothing is too atrocious or just plain dumb.

They are using this event as a pretext to restrict free expression and propose wacky bills banning images from maps. Now, they are arrogating the right to name Republican-sponsored legislation.

Dem Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-ME) was not moved to call for a “more civil dialogue” whe the President referred to his political opponents as “enemies,” but now she wants the GOP to change the tone:

A good place to start a more civil dialog would be for my Republican colleagues in the House to change the name of the bill they have introduced to repeal health care reform. The bill, titled the “Repeal the Job Killing Health Care Law Act,” was set to come up for a vote this week, but in the wake of Gabby’s shooting, it has been postponed at least until next week.

How nice. She’s for civil discource. That’s why she condemned Alan Grayson for claiming that Republicans wanted patients dead. Oh, sorry, she was as silent as the grave on that. Oops! Did I just incite violence?

Is she suggesting that the phrase “job killing” incites violence? Nooooo … not at aaaaall. She would NEVER suggest such a thing. She just doesn’t think it’s “necessary” to tell the truth about ObamaCare:

Don’t get me wrong—I’m not suggesting that the name of that one piece of legislation somehow led to the horror of this weekend—but is it really necessary to put the word “killing” in the title of a major piece of legislation? I don’t think that word is in there by accident …

Here’s my suggestion for removing the phrase “job killing” from bills designed to roll back the legislative overreach of the past few years.  The Democrats should STOP killing jobs. That would do the trick.

[ht Michelle Malkin]

Comments 1

  1. Rich wrote:

    Miriam-Webster has one definition for the word “protection:”

    money extorted by racketeers posing as a protective association

    It’s use in legislation should also be prohibited. I updated Rep. Pingree’s note to reflect the relevant prohibition on language:

    A good place to start a more civil dialog would be for my Republican colleagues our Democratic representatives in the House to change the name of the bill law they have introduced passed to repeal enact health care reform. The bill, titled the Repeal the Job Killing Health Care Law Act “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” was set to come up for a vote this week has already been passed , but in the wake of Gabby’s shooting, it has been postponed at least until next week it’s name should be reconsidered.

    Don’t get me wrong—I’m not suggesting that the name of that one piece of legislation somehow led to the horror of this weekend—but is it really necessary to put the word killing “protection” in the title of a major piece of legislation? I don’t think that word is in there by accident—my Republican Democratic friends know as well as anyone the power of words to send a message. But in this environment and at this moment in our nation’s history, it’s not the message we should be sending.

    Doubleplusgood.

    Posted 11 Jan 2011 at 6:42 am

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *