<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VIDEO: GINGRICH SAYS &#8220;THE RULE OF OBAMA&#8221; ON DOMA AND OCARE IS &#8220;VERY DANGEROUS&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/02/26/video-gingrich-says-the-rule-of-obama-on-doma-and-ocare-is-very-dangerous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/02/26/video-gingrich-says-the-rule-of-obama-on-doma-and-ocare-is-very-dangerous/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:18:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/02/26/video-gingrich-says-the-rule-of-obama-on-doma-and-ocare-is-very-dangerous/#comment-463708</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/02/26/video-gingrich-says-the-rule-of-obama-on-doma-and-ocare-is-very-dangerous/#comment-463708</guid>
		<description>Whether it&#039;s an insult or not,  it&#039;s irrelevant to the issue.   It is an attempt to discredit the argument by being critical of the source,  while ignoring the issue at hand.  It is &lt;i&gt;argumentum ad hominem&lt;/i&gt;. 

We see a lot of that from the left,  and some from the right (though not nearly as much).  I have no source for that assertion,  it is my own opinion/observation,  and may be anecdotal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it&#8217;s an insult or not,  it&#8217;s irrelevant to the issue.   It is an attempt to discredit the argument by being critical of the source,  while ignoring the issue at hand.  It is <i>argumentum ad hominem</i>. </p>
<p>We see a lot of that from the left,  and some from the right (though not nearly as much).  I have no source for that assertion,  it is my own opinion/observation,  and may be anecdotal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/02/26/video-gingrich-says-the-rule-of-obama-on-doma-and-ocare-is-very-dangerous/#comment-463705</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/02/26/video-gingrich-says-the-rule-of-obama-on-doma-and-ocare-is-very-dangerous/#comment-463705</guid>
		<description>Why is it an insult to point out that Gingrich violated the sanctity of two marriages?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it an insult to point out that Gingrich violated the sanctity of two marriages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/02/26/video-gingrich-says-the-rule-of-obama-on-doma-and-ocare-is-very-dangerous/#comment-463699</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/02/26/video-gingrich-says-the-rule-of-obama-on-doma-and-ocare-is-very-dangerous/#comment-463699</guid>
		<description>Because it is all they know.  I think it is funny.  It proves that they have nothing to offer besides insults. I think must be a liberal requirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it is all they know.  I think it is funny.  It proves that they have nothing to offer besides insults. I think must be a liberal requirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis De</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/02/26/video-gingrich-says-the-rule-of-obama-on-doma-and-ocare-is-very-dangerous/#comment-463695</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis De</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 14:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/02/26/video-gingrich-says-the-rule-of-obama-on-doma-and-ocare-is-very-dangerous/#comment-463695</guid>
		<description>Why is it you folks always have to go to personal attacks rather than debate the question. Do you or do you not feel that it is OK for the president to arbitrarily ignore the law in the case of DOMA or ignore a judges order in the case of Obama-Care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it you folks always have to go to personal attacks rather than debate the question. Do you or do you not feel that it is OK for the president to arbitrarily ignore the law in the case of DOMA or ignore a judges order in the case of Obama-Care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/02/26/video-gingrich-says-the-rule-of-obama-on-doma-and-ocare-is-very-dangerous/#comment-463693</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/02/26/video-gingrich-says-the-rule-of-obama-on-doma-and-ocare-is-very-dangerous/#comment-463693</guid>
		<description>I guess it takes a serial adulterer to defend marriage these days. By the way David, who described your beloved GW Bush&#039;s tenure as a case study in &quot;arrogance, isolation and destructiveness&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it takes a serial adulterer to defend marriage these days. By the way David, who described your beloved GW Bush&#8217;s tenure as a case study in &#8220;arrogance, isolation and destructiveness&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

