<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PALIN PUNKS POMPOUS PUNDITS &#8230; AGAIN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/06/06/palin-punks-pompous-pundits-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/06/06/palin-punks-pompous-pundits-again/</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:18:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/06/06/palin-punks-pompous-pundits-again/#comment-464267</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/06/06/palin-punks-pompous-pundits-again/#comment-464267</guid>
		<description>You could be right. Your interpretation is at least plausible. And, in the end, it&#039;s probably better to be lucky than smart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could be right. Your interpretation is at least plausible. And, in the end, it&#8217;s probably better to be lucky than smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/06/06/palin-punks-pompous-pundits-again/#comment-464266</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/06/06/palin-punks-pompous-pundits-again/#comment-464266</guid>
		<description>@Diogenes

No. On that occasion, she was correct and her critics were wrong and unfair. All I am saying is that, on this one, she gave a very poor response and got lucky that (if interpreted generously) it could be considered true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Diogenes</p>
<p>No. On that occasion, she was correct and her critics were wrong and unfair. All I am saying is that, on this one, she gave a very poor response and got lucky that (if interpreted generously) it could be considered true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/06/06/palin-punks-pompous-pundits-again/#comment-464237</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/06/06/palin-punks-pompous-pundits-again/#comment-464237</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Ms. Palin got very lucky ...&lt;/i&gt;

Did she also &quot;get lucky&quot; when she caught them napping with the 1773 comment last October?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ms. Palin got very lucky &#8230;</i></p>
<p>Did she also &#8220;get lucky&#8221; when she caught them napping with the 1773 comment last October?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/06/06/palin-punks-pompous-pundits-again/#comment-464236</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 13:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2011/06/06/palin-punks-pompous-pundits-again/#comment-464236</guid>
		<description>Ms. Palin got very lucky; I doubt that that is what she had in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Palin got very lucky; I doubt that that is what she had in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

