Candy Crowley, who interrupted Tuesday night’s presidential debate to validate Obama’s lie about what he said on September 12 concerning the attack on our Benghazi consulate, is now featured in an anti-Obama ad in which she is shown saying:

They spent two weeks telling us this was about a tape and that there was this riot ootside the Benghazi consulate, which there wasn’t.

If the President believed that Benghazi was an act of terrorism on September 12, why did he spend two weeks claiming that it was “spontaneous demonstration”?

Comments 1

  1. Dick Bouchie wrote:

    It is extraordinary that Nixon came under so much fire and that those who investigated Watergate did not ask his permission nor ask him to testify against himself. In the case of Benghazi, Congress doesn’t seem to be able to call for a special investigation where Obama is not controlling it, nor are they able to hold an impartial hearing such as was done in Watergate. My question is, “Why?” “When did Congress lose that same right or power to do such investigations?” It just may be that the Senate is blocking it so the Democrats don’t lose control of the Senate and of the White House. Something to think about. Justness is not being seen in this issue.

    Posted 21 Oct 2012 at 5:12 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *