<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Health Care BS</title>
	<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com</link>
	<description>Cleaning the Augean Stables of the Health Care Debate</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>90 SECONDS TO GOVT-RUN HEALTH CARE</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/19/video-90-seconds-to-govt-run-health-care/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/19/video-90-seconds-to-govt-run-health-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reform BS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/19/video-90-seconds-to-govt-run-health-care/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick recap, from the NRCC Code Red project, of how we came to this pass. At every turn, it is the Democrats against the American people. These people should change the name of their party. If it ever had anything to do with Democracy, that&#8217;s a part of history. A more appropriate name would be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/19/video-90-seconds-to-govt-run-health-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THOMAS SOWELL EXPLAINS WHY THE DEMS WANT TO DEFY THE VOTERS ON OBAMACARE</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/they-want-to-ram-obamacare-through-because-the-public-hates-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/they-want-to-ram-obamacare-through-because-the-public-hates-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reform BS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/they-want-to-ram-obamacare-through-because-the-public-hates-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you still harbor doubts that the public hates Obamacare, the latest survey from Pew (hardly a hive of Tea Party types) should extinguish them. Echoing all the serious polls, it shows 48% to 38% against:

This is where the public has been since early last Fall. So, why do Obama, congressional Democrats and the establishment &#8220;news&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/they-want-to-ram-obamacare-through-because-the-public-hates-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>STUPAK: OBAMACARE BATTLE HAS BEEN A &#8220;LIVING HELL&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/stupak-reform-fight-has-been-a-living-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/stupak-reform-fight-has-been-a-living-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reform BS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/stupak-reform-fight-has-been-a-living-hell/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There aren&#8217;t very many Democrats left with actual principles, and the price Bart Stupak has paid for his anti-abortion stand goes a long way toward explaining why:
Leading a revolt against President Barack Obama’s healthcare legislation over abortion has been a &#8216;living hell&#8217; for Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) &#8230; The telephone lines in his Washington and district [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/stupak-reform-fight-has-been-a-living-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HOWARD STERN: THE DEMS ARE COMMUNISTS</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/howard-stern-the-dems-are-communists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/howard-stern-the-dems-are-communists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous BS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/howard-stern-the-dems-are-communists/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep. That’s what he said. He’s apparently been mugged by reality (the reality of the Federal Comunications Commission):
The fact that these democrats at the FCC are communists - they&#8217;re for communism. They don&#8217;t want to see companies &#8212; this is gangsterism:
So &#8230; can we expect a different attitude from HHS and the other health care [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/howard-stern-the-dems-are-communists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COBURN WARNS HOUSE DEMS: &#8220;BE PREPARED TO DEFEND SELLING YOUR VOTE&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/coburn-warns-house-dems-be-prepared-to-defend-selling-your-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/coburn-warns-house-dems-be-prepared-to-defend-selling-your-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reform BS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/coburn-warns-house-dems-be-prepared-to-defend-selling-your-vote/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the consolation prizes Obama and Pelosi can promise House Dems who lose their seats due to a &#8220;yes&#8221; vote on Obamacare is a cushy job running some federal agency. Senator Tom Coburn had a warning for such people today:
If you voted &#8216;no&#8217; and you vote &#8216;yes,&#8217; and you lose your election, and you think any nomination to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/coburn-warns-house-dems-be-prepared-to-defend-selling-your-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LANDMARK LEGAL FOUNDATION &#8220;READY TO GO&#8221; ON CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO SLAUGHTER RULE</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/landmark-legal-foundation-to-file-constitutional-challenge-to-slaughter-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/landmark-legal-foundation-to-file-constitutional-challenge-to-slaughter-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reform BS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/landmark-legal-foundation-to-file-constitutional-challenge-to-slaughter-rule/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Levin said yesterday that he and his partners are ready to go:
Landmark Legal Foundation President Mark Levin, who served as chief of staff in the Reagan Justice Department, said he plans to file an immediate lawsuit if House Democratic leaders try to use an unconstitutional manuever to pass the Senate health care bill without [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/18/landmark-legal-foundation-to-file-constitutional-challenge-to-slaughter-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>STANFORD LAW PROFESSOR EXPLAINS HOW SLAUGHTER RULE VIOLATES CONSTITUTION</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/stanford-law-prof-explains-how-slaughter-rule-violates-constitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/stanford-law-prof-explains-how-slaughter-rule-violates-constitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reform BS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/stanford-law-prof-explains-how-slaughter-rule-violates-constitutional/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael W. McConnell, a director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School and a former judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, explains that the Slaughter Rule departs from the Constitution at several points. He also disposes of the disingenuous argument that it has been done many times [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/stanford-law-prof-explains-how-slaughter-rule-violates-constitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VIDEO: EVEN CHRIS MATTHEWS SCORNS THE SLAUGHTER STRATEGY</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/video-even-chris-matthews-slams-slaughter-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/video-even-chris-matthews-slams-slaughter-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Journalistic BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reform BS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/video-even-chris-matthews-slams-slaughter-strategy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthews hits a theme that several NBC commentators have focused on: How can you demand an up or down vote on reconciliation (in the Senate) and then &#8220;deem&#8221; the bill passed in the House without voting on it?
Matthews does not, of course, object to such skulduggery because it is dishonest. He&#8217;s worried about how it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/video-even-chris-matthews-slams-slaughter-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEJM SURVEY: 46% OF PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS SAY OBAMACARE WILL FORCE THEM OUT OF MEDICINE</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/nejm-poll-46-of-primary-care-physicians-say-obamacare-will-force-them-out-of-medicine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/nejm-poll-46-of-primary-care-physicians-say-obamacare-will-force-them-out-of-medicine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Physician BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rationing BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reform BS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/nejm-poll-46-of-primary-care-physicians-say-obamacare-will-force-them-out-of-medicine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: 
NEJM has bowdlerized this story. This morning, the link below went directly to data from the survey. Now it takes you to a page about physician recruitment, the second paragraph of which provides a link to The Medicus Firm, which apparently conducted the survey in December.
As Paul Hsieh noted last night, NEJM is &#8220;hardly a right-wing rag.&#8221; An understatement if ever there [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/nejm-poll-46-of-primary-care-physicians-say-obamacare-will-force-them-out-of-medicine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRESIDENT ADMITS THAT OBAMACARE IS &#8220;A TRANSITION STEP&#8221; TOWARD SINGLE-PAYER</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/president-admits-that-obamacare-is-a-transitional-step-toward-single-payer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/president-admits-that-obamacare-is-a-transitional-step-toward-single-payer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reform BS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Single-Payer BS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/president-admits-that-obamacare-is-a-transitional-step-toward-single-payer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you still harbor doubts that Obamacare is a first step toward single-payer health care, this montage of Obama speeches will eliminate them. He explicitly states that he is following the same path that Canada took to its government-run system:
Get a system in place, signed into law by the end of my first term as President and build off [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthcarebs.com/2010/03/17/president-admits-that-obamacare-is-a-transitional-step-toward-single-payer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
